Life
insurance fears following the London bombings tragedy
Released on
= August 10, 2005, 9:10 am
Press Release
Author = Richard Green
Industry = Financial
Press Release
Summary = Fear following the London bombings has lead to worries
concerning insurance policy terrorism exclusions.
Press Release
Body = Following on from the tube train and bus bomb attacks in
London there was a move from several UK insurance companies to reassure
victims that claims would be processed “quickly and sympathetically”.
This need for reassurance came in light of concerns that many victims
of the blasts would not be covered by their
existing health and life insurance cover. This would mean that families
of the bombing victims could not only lose a relative, but also
suffer financial hardship
as life insurance companies refuse to pay out on policies.
Standard Life,
Axa-PPP and Norwich Union all announced that policy holders would
be covered for events on the 7th July. Standard Life said that the
company was not looking to "cause more distress" to victims
and their families.
Reuters have
been told that other firms such as Churchill, Endsleigh and Direct
Line are likely to be sympathetic when dealing with people who have
been injured or whose holidays have been disrupted, however these
insurers have fallen short of announcing complete cover.
Churchill said
that it would, "provide cancellation and personal accident
cover if customers are physically injured on the way to their holiday
departure…in addition, if any of our customers are away on
holiday and hear of injury or death to a close relative, we will
facilitate their return home…missed departures due to travel
delay in central London will also be treated sympathetically.”
This is despite Churchill including ‘acts of terrorism’
exclusions into their policies. This means that policies will generally
not pay-out if losses are sustained due to any terrorist activities.
This represents one of several general exclusion clauses which are
often regularly added to many policies and which prevent payout
for particular
potentially costly situations for the insurers.
The terrorism
exclusion is still regularly included in policies despite the introduction
in 1993 of the Terrorism Insurance Program which provides reinsurance
cover to the majority of U.K. insurers, is expected to absorb a
large proportion of the insurance claims resulting from the 7th
July attacks. Under the program, the insurance industry as a whole
is liable for 75 million pounds per terrorist "event",
with losses above that covered by a mutual reinsurance pool. Should
the costs rise above the funds available through the pool, then
the UK Treasury will step in to
cover the remaining costs.
Another group
recently highlighted who may fall foul of this exclusion is the
emergency services workers. Unison representatives have warned that
this exclusion clause could leave emergency workers and their families
high and dry if they are injured or killed. This would prove particularly
disastrous for families with personal insurance policies which cover
accidents and that also offer mortgage protection, as the potential
loss of income due to injury combined with the lack of mortgage
cover resulting from the exclusion, could mean those workers’
families
affected may experience difficulties maintaining their future mortgage
payments.
Some fire crews in Somerset have already threatened to go on strike
due to claims that they may not be insured if they are injured whilst
dealing with a terrorist attack. This action has since been called
off, but many emergency workers are still justifiably worried, not
only for their own safety, but also their families should anything
happen to them whilst responding to a terrible emergency such as
has
already been seen in London.
Unison ( http://www.unison.org.uk/
) pointed out that its own insurance policy which is offered to
members provided full cover and called for other insurers to do
the same.
Sam Oestreicher
of Unison said, "We are asking all insurance companies to look
at their policies and if they have such exclusion clauses to drop
them".
The Association
of British Insurers has also tried to reassure emergency workers
and other customers saying, “most types of insurance are readily
available without terrorism exclusions… The major personal
types of insurance, such as life, household and comprehensive motor
insurance provide cover for the effects of a terrorist incident
as a standard feature of the policy."
Today the plethora
of online comparison sites such as Moneynet ( http://www.moneynet.co.uk
) or Moneyfacts can search all the insurance policies
available and provide guides to help consumers make decisions, however
the need for people to check with providers to ensure they are not
left unprotected has never been more evident.
The insurance
industry itself has admitted that some policies do have exclusion
clauses and are also advising policyholders to study the small print
or contact their insurance company or broker to determine their
cover levels.
Web Site = http://www.moneynet.co.uk
Contact Details
= E-mail: INFO@MONEYNET.CO.UK
Telephone: 020 8313 9030
Fax: 020 8464 1971
Website: http://www.moneynet.co.uk
Address: Moneynet
Sussex House
8-10 Homesdale Road
Bromley
Kent
BR2 9LZ
Printer
Friendly Format
Back to previous
page...
Back to home page...
Submit your
press releases...
|